MALL proof nets identify proofs modulo rule commutation

نویسندگان

  • Rob J. van Glabbeek
  • Dominic J. D. Hughes
چکیده

The proof nets for MALL (Multiplicative Additive Linear Logic [2], without units) introduced in [4, 5] solved numerous issues with monomial proof nets [3], for example: • There is a simple (deterministic) translation function from cut-free proofs to proof nets. • Cut elimination is simply defined and strongly normalising. • Proof nets form a semi (i.e., unit-free) star-autonomous category with (co)products. A proof net is a set of linkings on a sequent. Each linking is a set of links between complementary formula leaves (literal occurrences). Figure 1 illustrates the translation of a proof into a proof net. In this paper we prove that the translation precisely captures proofs modulo rule commutation: two proofs translate to the same proof net if and only if one can be obtained from the other by a succession of rule commutations. A rule commutation is a transposition of adjacent rules that preserves subproofs immediately above, with possible duplication/identification, for example

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Proof Nets for Unit-free Multiplicative-Additive Linear Logic (Extended abstract)

A cornerstone of the theory of proof nets for unit-free multiplicative linear logic (MLL) is the abstract representation of cut-free proofs modulo inessential commutations of rules. The only known extension to additives, based on monomial weights, fails to preserve this key feature: a host of cut-free monomial proof nets can correspond to the same cut-free proof. Thus the problem of finding a s...

متن کامل

Canonical Proof nets for Classical Logic

Proof nets provide abstract counterparts to sequent proofs modulo rule permutations; the idea being that if two proofs have the same underlying proof-net, they are in essence the same proof. Providing a convincing proof-net counterpart to proofs in the classical sequent calculus is thus an important step in understanding classical sequent calculus proofs. By convincing, we mean that (a) there s...

متن کامل

Expansion Nets: Proof-Nets for Propositional Classical Logic

We give a calculus of proof-nets for classical propositional logic. These nets improve on a proposal due to Robinson by validating the associativity and commutativity of contraction, and provide canonical representants for classical sequent proofs modulo natural equivalences. We present the relationship between sequent proofs and proof-nets as an annotated sequent calculus, deriving formulae de...

متن کامل

A characterization of MALL hypercoherent semantic correctness

We give a graph theoretical criterion on Multiplicative Additive Linear Logic (MALL) cut-free proof structures that exactly characterizes those whose interpretation is a hyperclique in Ehrhard’s hypercoherent spaces. This criterion is strictly weaker than the one given by Hughes and van Glabbeek characterizing proof nets (i.e. desequentialized sequent calculus proofs). We thus also give the fir...

متن کامل

Decreasing Diagrams II

This theory formalizes a commutation version of decreasing diagrams for Church-Rosser modulo. The proof follows Felgenhauer and van Oostrom (RTA 2013). The theory also provides important specializations, in particular van Oostrom’s conversion version (TCS 2008) of decreasing diagrams. We follow the development described in [1]: Conversions are mapped to Greek strings, and we prove that whenever...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1609.04693  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016